My day at work went surprisingly smooth. I got out at 6:30, which wasn't too bad, however tomorrow may be a bit more intense. Of course luckily I can draw a line in the sand because Wednesday is my wonderful midweek rendevous in Central square with Kate.
We always meet by 6:45 (give or take five minutes... lately "give") and have a nice supper. In the more pleasant weather it is usually accompanied by some extensive walking, however since it is cold we've been finding creative ways to take nearly 2 hours to eat. It is a fantastic hobby, and it really is something to look forward to. I'm hoping for Italian tomorrow. I've had enough more than enough meat lately. I always enjoyed spaghetti as a kid, and I'm really pining for some nostalgia. It will be like the meal equivalent of my mother rocking me to sleep. Really I'll settle for anything tomato sauce based with the exception of pizza. And of course I can probably be convinced to waiver on this whole craving as well as I tend to employ "equal opportunity" when it comes to food items intended for consumption.
I saw Tucker Carlson interviewed on Conan O'Brian last Thursday and was heavily amused by his two cents on lesbians. For those who don't know or have not heard me both bitch and laugh at this guy previously; Tucker Carlson is a conservative mouthpiece with a very Gen X style delivery. The guy is an elitist and out of touch with reality despite his youthful demeanor. I'm certain this guy is very likely a head case but hey who isn't now days.
I enjoyed watching him uncomfortably sit next to Johnny Knoxville. I guess an interview he did got him in trouble over at CNN back when he was on crossfire. I googled it so I could get it all just right... here's the juice:
Tucker Carlson in Elle magazine: "One area of liberal phenomenon I support is female bi-sexuality - this apparent increased willingness of girls to bring along a friend. That's a pretty good thing." Women "want to be listened to, protected and amused. And they want to be spanked vigorously every one in a while." On arguing, "most of the time you can beat a woman in an argument. But what do you win? Nothing. You get short-term pleasure followed by a lot of pain." If he could be any woman, he would be Elizabeth Birch of the Human Rights Campaign because "you'd be presiding over an organization of thousands of lesbians, some of them quite good-looking." (Geez, Tucker. Obsess much?) Carlson would go to bed with Hillary Clinton: "Every time I see her I think I could, you know, help. She seems tense." (What a humanitarian.) He would pick Laura Ingraham over Ann Coulter because "with Ann you could get bruised on the angles."
I actually swiped that from wonkette.com's gossip columnist ala' google. It was complete with the included witty comments.
Well lets look around at the news....
Here's the latest in "We are all doomed" news. Just in case you are looking to feed any self destructive urges/vices etc., here, some fuel for the fire.
Climate study predicts big thaw
The good news is this might make it easier to drill through the Artic tundra. It will be less wear and tear on those really big drill bits. Perhaps less fossil fuel will be used to drill through the soft muddy earth? :D
Gregoire's homely distant relative passes away
Gregoire you are much prettier, but there is some sort of uncanny resemblance. Hey who knew this guy was a cook! And also, he was only 57 and died of lung cancer. For all of you with fondness of cancer sticks, smokey treats, nicotine fixes or what have you, may this be your umpteenth warning. Yes umpteenth, you read correctly.
Old Harvard Sq. faces brand-name onslaught
This is a bit about the changing face of Harvard square and how the bohemian element is being replaced by the glitz of corporate America. To put this in perspective, two of the filming locations from Good Will Hunting, which were Harvard Square main stays, no longer exist. The Brattle theater is now in danger and hobbling on its last legs. (You'd think Harvard with its Billions might just step in... but apparently not)
In some regards this is very sad and disappointing, in other regards I think other areas are filling the shoes that Harvard Square once wore. Davis Square boasts a theater that shows independent and second run movies for low prices, not to mention has the occasional live show. Coolidge Corner shows Indy and art films, as well as classics. The Kendall, a multiplex in "Kendall square" of course two stops away on the red line from Harvard, shows nearly exclusively art & independent films. Even Arlington, Stoneham, and Lexington, which are pretty much the suburbs boast small second run/ independent movie theaters where they probably did not previously. I read in an editorial once that Arlington is the new "Cambridge". I'd probably argue the case for Somerville first but hey, regardless things change.
In large metropolitan areas there will likely always be havens for artists and bohemians, and in most cases, they will almost always eventually get "priced out". It is cyclical, and part of the beauty of the ever changing urban environment. New memories for new generations. I think we are lucky that Harvard square has had its character preserved as well as it has despite its current Formica franchised demeanor.
I can't believe Good Will Hunting is almost nine years old. Yesterday I was speaking about stopping to reflect on the passage of time. I remember going to see it in the "new" theater in Windham with Tim, John, & Jim. I can't believe we've known each other that long let alone that a movie which still seems "recent" in my mind is nearly a decade old.
Wednesday, December 28, 2005
So... the passage of time, about that....
Posted by George N. Parks at 12:51 AM 0 comments
Monday, December 26, 2005
A long December...
And there's reason to believe
maybe this year will be better than the last....
OK, so here is where I'm supposed to write something really profound. I went and saw relatives and old friends and the changing home town. So this, this is where I'm supposed to write about how I've put it all in perspective, and I stand in awe at life and how time flies and such drivel, but honestly I don't feel like it... and this year despite rather obvious changes in the world around me, I feel rather numb to the passage of time. (Wait... is that profound? I'm not quite sure)
Thursday night I slaved away at MLNM (work) until 11:00 pm. I couldn't sleep when I got home, wasn't prepared to leave on Friday for Maine... and ended up not arriving till late afternoon Christmas Eve. I'm going in to work tomorrow which is officially supposed to be a day off (lovely).
The holidays weren't too rough, and for the most part I was actually looking forward to them for a change. I will say Friday I was in limbo. I didn't want to stay in Massachusetts, yet I didn't want to drive to Maine. Essentially I was feeling like nothing in the moment could please me or capture my attention. I was really burnt out, and admittedly I'm not even close to being recovered, although for the most part it was a relaxing holiday.
Today I closed the holiday weekend by visiting with Jason Chaloux at his parents, where he had Alexia, his baby girl. She had grown quite a bit since the last time I saw her. Eric Labelle, another old friend also was there.
Following this my Uncle Fritz treated my father and I to a few beers and some lunch at the new "Gritty's" brew pub in Auburn. It is a great addition to the area, and for the most part looks almost exactly like the Old Port location on the inside. I hung around my parent's till 6:30 or so before ultimately heading out in mixed precipitation for my trek down south. The roads weren't too bad. It probably only took me an extra half hour or so.
I'm tired... yet I don't want to go to bed... because I know time will pass quicker and suddenly I'll be on my way to work.
I wonder what the chances are that I could actually work a 9-5 day tomorrow?
Perhaps tomorrow I'll post some humorous links or political rants, today however I'm a little too melancholy. If nothing else the Patriots are winning.
Posted by George N. Parks at 11:43 PM 0 comments
Thursday, December 22, 2005
Happy Holidays!
Hello All!
I don't have much to say tonight.
Work has consumed me lately. I did manage to get out tonight and Kate & I had a bite at UNO's in Harvard Square. We felt the mood for some wonderful franchised grub I suppose. We've become talented at milking our meal time and making it last a couple of hours in this cold weather. It was quite easy tonight because Cambridge is sort of deserted. All of the students have gone away for break, and everyone else is probably out busy preparing for the holidays or trying to meet those year end deadlines.
Anyway... I will be heading on break Friday through Monday. The following weekend will be another long one. So I apologize for irregularity in my posting schedule. I will try and resume the routine in the new year, and post when I can until that time arrives.
-Have fun!
Posted by George N. Parks at 12:37 AM 0 comments
Sunday, December 18, 2005
Capra, Kong, W and a "Holiday" Song
My weekend was nice, and I hope all of yours were as good. I watched one of my all time favorite films, "Its a Wonderful Life" with Kate. She had never seen it and I had to twist her arm a bit. I cried like a baby like I always do... Because I'm a pathetic shell of a man, but hey... That's who I am what can I say.
I went in saw King Kong on Friday Night. It was quite thrilling, however as a warning to those who aren't aware it is very long. There are also scenes in this that I think will make just about anyone cringe. It was so well done I was even feeling the pain of a T-Rex who was unwise to mess with Kong. I found the giant insects particularly nasty. I really don't see this movie becoming the next Titanic. I think those predictions are completely off base. I will say that the women in the cinema generally were vocalizing how cute they thought Jackson's CGI giant appeared. I heard quite a few "Awwwws" and "poor baby" and "he's sooo cute", which quite frankly is sort of weird. There is a lot of comedy in this film, more than I expected.
I think the most amazing part of this film might be the recreation of depression era New York City. It is spectacular to behold. The CGI artists who do this work are nothing short of genius. It is some of the most breathtaking art of our times, and I believe because of it's packaging, it will likely be so under appreciated or taken for granted.
In our mad mad mad political world:
So the lack luster Commander and Chief steps up to the plate and pitches a pretty good game.
Transcript of Bush speech
Not too shabby W, I look forward to the pundits and commentators.
Using a line from Longfellow's "Christmas Bells" was very clever. Very very clever Georgie ole' boy. You, or at least your interns or quite apt.
Longfellow was one of the literary greats of American History. He wrote the following during the civil war that hit him close to home as his son was one of its victims. In our times it is probably better known as a popular carol of the season. I've highlighted the lines use in W's speech.
Henry Wadsworth Longfellow (1807-1882)
Christmas Bells
I HEARD the bells on Christmas Day
Their old, familiar carols play,
And wild and sweet
The words repeat
Of peace on earth, good-will to men!
And thought how, as the day had come,
The belfries of all Christendom
Had rolled along
The unbroken song
Of peace on earth, good-will to men!
Till ringing, singing on its way,
The world revolved from night to day,
A voice, a chime,
A chant sublime
Of peace on earth, good-will to men!
Then from each black, accursed mouth
The cannon thundered in the South,
And with the sound
The carols drowned
Of peace on earth, good-will to men!
It was as if an earthquake rent
The hearth-stones of a continent,
And made forlorn
The households born
Of peace on earth, good-will to men!
And in despair I bowed my head;
"There is no peace on earth," I said;
"For hate is strong,
And mocks the song
Of peace on earth, good-will to men!"
Then pealed the bells more loud and deep:
"God is not dead, nor doth He sleep;
The Wrong shall fail,
The Right prevail,
With peace on earth, good-will to men."
I'm wondering if it was an intentional use of the "Right prevail" of if that double entendre is merely a coincidence. Clever either way.
Anyway while the way this administration has conducted it self, more often than not has appalled me, the current agenda of communicating with the American public about the Iraq war is long over due. Cheney in particular held on to falsehoods way too long, and this administration until recently has not given the American public the respect it deserves. While there is still a way to go, Bush has taken a step in the right direction.
Mr. President if you want people to respect and trust you, you have to give them the benefit of the doubt that they will understand your actions when explaining things to them. Of course, you have to start by actually telling people more of your plan, rather than just asserting our vengeance towards evildoers and what not.
Additionally I must contribute my two cents about the whole NSA scandal. This is definitely a planned leftist attack on the administration by the New York times. The story was held, and released in perfect timing to undermine the success of the elections (Or to add to what might have gone wrong). While I support the Patriot act being re-written in ways to protect civil liberties (Marijuana trafficking is not terrorist activity, and wire taps and searches without warrants for example, should still be illegal) at the same time I think that certain international calls should be monitored, and I'm sure this policy has been very beneficial to the United States. If you aren't guilty of some illegal activity, than you shouldn't care. This isn't being used on domestic calls (although our cell phone conversations unlike land-lines can legally be monitored and the technology exists, not only that, but the government can trace your location within 100 yards from your phone signal. Big Brother is alive and well).
I used to be fond of Howard Dean, but the more I see of this guy the more disappointed I get. Going after this NSA order by Bush will back-fire for the democrats. Dean has endorsed an agenda for the democrats that only serves to help the right achieve more of their to-do list. The hate filled rhetoric of the far left is seeping into the main stream democratic party, and even if much of it is true, the absurdist and exaggerated passion sticks in people's mind. You would think Dean would have learned as much from his experience in the primaries.
I have to admit that Hillary Clinton has been stellar about her poise and saying the proper and rational thing unlike many (lately- most) of her colleagues. I'm sure it has a great deal to do with her presidential aspirations. If anything at all she is showing that she is much more intelligent than John Kerry, however it is unlikely any of that will matter in 2008. She does have a good coach and ally in good ole bubbah however.
Posted by George N. Parks at 11:10 PM 0 comments
Friday, December 16, 2005
Well I survived..
My presentation has come and gone, and now I can move on to other trials and tribulations.
This holiday season has to be one of my busiest to date.
Tonight I actually managed to leave work at 5:45 which was a nice change from 8:00 pm.
I could continue spitting out fragmented thoughts, however I think I'll conclude this lack luster post here.
Ooooohhh... Check this out, perhaps W will continue and do more things to make me feel warm and fuzzy. McCain 2008!
McCain, Bush agree on torture ban
Pretty good Falwell Political cartoon
Posted by George N. Parks at 1:00 AM 0 comments
Wednesday, December 14, 2005
I don't want to write this post...
And alas, here I am typing away nonsensical psycho babble.
So... Anyone see any good movies lately?
I have to say the last really good film I've seen in the theater was "Walk the Line". I'm anticipating Memoirs of a Geisha, The Producers, I've read good things about "Me you and everyone we know". I'm thinking I'm also going to have to see "Syriana", "Capote", "Ice Harvest". I do want to see King Kong, and if I had the time, I might have even seen it already... but alas I do not. Maybe I'll try and catch a matinee this weekend. Harry Potter was good, but alas I knew what I was getting myself into there, and I'm not unbiased because I've read the books. Actually I was thinking the film might have been difficult to follow if you haven't read the books. That movie probably wasn't one to catch if you haven't seen the first three either.
There is a heaping pile of films I've wanted to see... but never seem to find myself in the right frame of mind to catch. "Kinsey" is one, I never saw Charlize's "Monster", and I know there are a few others too.
My music tastes of late, well I bought a CD over Amazon by the "Fruit Bats" "spelled in bones". I would call it the Shins meet Guster. It definitely is the pop sound of a bygone era, which honestly I look for in music. Yes I like abstract shock art just like the next true music fan. I like new sounds sure, but at the same time, some sounds are meant to be heard again. This is what can be said about this band.
The following is a review written by someone who doesn't expect albums to have titles unrelated to the actual music, and three minutes of feedback in the middle of a song that can't decide whether it is electronica or jam rock. Its a simplistic few words, but they are spoken by someone who isn't more bitter & judgmental of a person than I am. In other words, someone quite normal.
Fruit Bats Review- Spelled in Bones
I actually think while simple the lyrics are actually quite good. I can't say the same for another band who I picked up an album for. "Doves". The music is actually quite nice, I'd describe it as having a rather hypnotic sense of momentum at times. The lyrics on the other hand out right suck. I could have written something more profound when I was ten. "N.Y." From "doves the last broadcast" boasts lines such as
"They're throwing rocks and paving stones
So lets go while we can
Put your finger on the map
Who cares where it lands
Cause we're all better off in New York"
OK I've heard worse, yet somehow a Brit pop act singing about New York perhaps irritated me. When I listened to this CD the first time, I fell asleep.
As far as other artists I've listened to lately, that I would be fine with falling asleep to, or listening to every lyric and metaphor uttered, Iron & Wine. Iron & Wine is the latest in that Indy/quasi folk feel that is sort of emo without the electricity. It has a very original sound, and beautifully worded ballads can captivate just as easy as they can relax. An associate of mine tried coaxing me into seeing them at Avalon recently, however I relented. They performed with a frequent collaborator, Calexico which has this odd echoing reverb affect in their vocals. I guess Iron & Wine's lead went electric and did a few covers and deviations from their material. It sounds like I missed out.
The Dears, another band that I've recently purchased their album. It borrows heavily from "The Smiths" and "Morrissey", and so of course I love it. There are a few songs of rather epic proportions that wouldn't be out of place gracing a Pink Floyd album.
Continuing on the 80s homage, "The Bravery" is quite good. The aren't as good as say, "Franz Ferdinand or Interpol" but definitely are worth checking out. Think more along the line of "New Order" than "Joy Division".
Well... That was pleasant, not complaining about work or politics.
SO... As usual, not to alienate my frequent readers... lets put up a little political gumbo.
First of all... after three years or so, it is about time W started actually speaking coherently and communicating with people. If he had done this all along, everyone would likely have quite a different opinion of the guy.
W's
admittance
And to prove that W's campaign, which shouldn't be limited to just a handful of appearances, (but is) is helping stem some of the "Cindy Sheehan B.S." Here is another article.
Poll #s suggest less opposed to presence in Iraq
Granted it is just a few percentage points.
I'll repeat. We should not have gone to Iraq. We should have been more prepared, planned better, or had other alternatives. The old proverb "Haste makes waste" definitely seems to apply here.
However. We are there. So we have to deal. Pulling out immediately after going in will leave not only Iraq in trouble, but the world. It is our duty to see things through. This isn't Vietnam. Communism isn't going to just settle in and life won't just go on. The only thing Iraq will succumb to if we leave is anarchy, and the region, along with the rest of the world will pay the price.
By the way I feel sorry for Sheehan, because she is being used and manipulated, because she has become addicted to the limelight, and because she is well, sort of embarrasing to everyone who sympathizes with her. Everyone, that is, who isn't an import driving granola with no Jam Band bash to attend.
Well, I suppose its time to cut this off.
Hope everyone has a smashing Thursday.
Posted by George N. Parks at 11:06 PM 0 comments
Monday, December 12, 2005
The Grind continues
Another late night at work. The department head also nominated me to present in our weekly data club meeting. How pleased am I? I'll be doing some last minute power point work and trying to wrap my head around things.
It is really important I try to get in early tomorrow as I have 4, 90 minute experiments to run, not to mention a fair share of data to organize. Today was eaten up by a meeting, and not to mention some aggravation over unfavorable results likely due to un-clean glassware. Prevention of this will likely be additional redundant conductivity checks of solutions and rinses of glassware with sterile water that I really wish I didn't have to do. I tell you, I'm having some of the most stupid luck over the past couple weeks that I've had over my entire career. Computers are malfunctioning, and more or less up seems like it is down and forwards is backward. North is South, East is West, etc.. etc. Then there are the people who seem to finally be recovering from crankiness from our move. At least that is a positive development. I hope it lasts.
Oh, did I mention my performance review is coming up? Great timing.
Yeah... I'll stop bitching and whining at any moment, sure I will.
On a more pleasant note, I had a nice weekend. Kate and I did some shopping for the holidays. I got a few things out of the way at least, hopefully I'll find a way to manage the last couple before the week is out.
In my news reference:
It looks like the Iraqi people are getting a true taste of democracy, awww, isn't it special?
Dirty tricks taint Iraqi elections
Posted by George N. Parks at 11:24 PM 2 comments
Saturday, December 10, 2005
Watching mice as the snow falls
I put in another long night at work today. Hopefully things will achieve some normalcy again after moving our lab & offices. The work is really spinning into high gear right now.
Quite a blizzard out today here in Beantown. I'd say we got 7-8 inches or so. It was windy and it came down fast. I was sheltered in the confines (actually vast expanses... our building is a high rise with quite a large floor layout) of 35 Landsdowne St. in Cambridge. Oddly today the T (subway) was running like clockwork. I was really expecting it to be ridiculously late.
On the way home, I enjoyed watching the mice forage for morsels and crumbs amongst the subway rails as I waited for the Oak Grove Orange line train to arrive at Downtown Crossing station. From a distance mice are fascinating and even sort of cute. Its just when they get in your living quarters that it really can be aggravating. So far no mice in my Melrose location. I had that bat in my room this summer however, and I'm still recovering from the trauma. I imagine the bat was much more freaked out than I was.
I'm not doing too well on my Christmas shopping. I'm quite behind... It is really sneaking up on me too, and I don't know what to do. ARRRRRGGGHHH... Vertigo setting in.....
OK, In the news (As if this will stop my head spinning).
Clinton: Bush 'flat wrong' on climate
I really think it is time for this Administration to step up to the plate. If they have problems with the Kyoto treaty an alternative that clearly explains the so called "improvements" needs to be put in place by our country. The bottom line is W cares more about share holders of big business then what could happen years from now if we continue burning fossil fuels at the current pace. When I say "what could happen" I'm not just talking climate change, I'm talking serious economic impact if fuel disappears and much of the Nation has not converted to alternative power sources.
Well, one link is enough for tonight. It is the weekend after all!
Posted by George N. Parks at 12:35 AM 0 comments
Friday, December 09, 2005
Work, Work, and yet more work.
I just spent my entire evening working on spreadsheets for work. I can't believe the amount of stuff I have to do. It really stinks because I feel I've been given an assignment at the last minute, and achieving the goals within the timelines set by... People outside of my realm. Well it isn't realistic.
Anyway. Politics Politics..
Rice: No guarantees on abuse
I was pretty horrified about the sexual abuse at Abu Gharib and the rotten conditions and stunts that particular group of Marines pulled. There are definitely limitations on what can be done to get information from prisoners. At Abu Gharib, sadly, I'm not quite so certain it was even that. Rather this was a group of lousy people amusing themselves at the expense of others. Not exactly something to do in order to curb terrorism.
Additionally, there have been reports of many prisoners who were victims of being in the wrong place at the wrong time. A cultural divide keeps them contained as a result. If anything, these people will likely become terrorists after being detained for no good reason. Whether it takes, more translators, more research and strategy, I'm not sure. One thing that is sure, is that carelessness breeds contempt, and we should avoid it at all costs.
However, having said all of this, I think many of the "abuse" allegations are getting out of control. I think we should be paying attention to how the new Iraqi police treat prisoners, and we should adhere to standards ourselves to set an example. However for anyone to believe that information can be retrieved from terror suspects without some coercion of some sort, they are having pipe dreams. That is the ugly nature of war.
Anyway,
Happy Friday!
Posted by George N. Parks at 12:43 AM 0 comments
Tuesday, December 06, 2005
A better Tomorrow?
(sigh)
I need prayers... well not as much as a lot of people, but I'm just really stressed out. The gloom of my former week is continuing into this one. Hopefully I'll feel better tomorrow. Arrrgghhh!!!!
Sorry about the negative energy but, this is a good an outlet as any, and I feel the need to put it somewhere.
here is a short from CNN on a Charlie Brown Christmas. Aside from Its A Wonderful Life, it really is my favorite Christmas time event. And Its a Wonderful Life, actually ranks amongst my favorite films.
Charlie Brown Christmas - CNN Report
As for the news:
Howard Dean is a creep,
Bush is generally wrong, but is right about finishing the job he started.
Saddam told everyone to go to hell.
and something a little different:
Researchers to trap mysterious cat-fox animal
Well...
To tomorrow (lifting up my glass)
Cheers
Posted by George N. Parks at 10:37 PM 0 comments
Monday, December 05, 2005
Monday Monday, can't beat that day....
Well, today I survived. The day went by quickly. Goals expected out of me did not seem unreasonable or unrealistic. Things were less chaotic. People did not seem to be openly secretly (yeah I know...) scornful. Also I was not amongst the ranks of the walking dead today, and not once did I fantasize of cracking someone's skull open and sucking out their brain. OK, well maybe I did just once.
Yes I'm aware, my posts have been uninspired and rather prosaic lately. For that I will flog myself with a barbed whip repeatedly. Rest assured I will savor each and every strike of the rawhide pierced with rusty barbed wire, and yes, my tetanus shots are up to date.
So what is in the news today?
Well... Lets see.
Scientists ponder Titanic discoveries
OK, not funny or controversial, I know, but wait, lets dig a little.
The premise of this research suggests the Titanic actually only took 5 minutes to sink, not 20. As a result, people in theory didn't suffer as much. Less time to think about impending doom and what not. Aside from this giving me more fodder to argue that "Titanic" was a lousy movie, is this is an amusing tidbit.
From the article:
Explorer Robert Ballard found the bulk of the wreck in 1985, at a depth of 13,000 feet and about 380 miles southeast of Newfoundland. Ballard was not impressed with the expedition's find.
"They found a fragment, big deal," Ballard said. "Am I surprised? No. When you go down there, there's stuff all over the place. It hit an iceberg and it sank. Get over it."
Awww..... Ballard seems a wee bit cranky, could it be that someone made a few wittle miss calculations? His page in history is perhaps due to ummm, sink a little faster?
Moving right along,
A valiant effort by this convicted crack head:
Man argues he's too overweight for jail
Didn't work however. On the bright side this may free up some time to focus on fitness. I've heard there are some good "government" gyms.
This is amusing, it speaks for itself:
Curtain shields Santa, sexy store display
In Entertainment Michael Keaton in his best performance since BATMAN spoke out against a creep who happens to be a damn fine actor, but perhaps a less than stellar person. This was at a dinner honoring Ron Howard.
"The bad news is that Russell Crowe isn't here," said Keaton to a crowd that included Jim Carrey, Renee Zellweger, Goldie Hawn, Kurt Russell, Jeffrey Tambor, Edie Falco plus Howard's family, his actress daughter Bryce Dallas Howard and producing partner Brian Grazer.
Crowe would have been a likely guest since he's starred in two Howard movies, "A Beautiful Mind" and "Cinderella Man."
"The good news," Keaton continued, "is that we don't have to listen to his [expletive deleted] band. They suck. They're horrible. John McCain came up with the anti-torture bill about them."
That probably won't help you land future roles Mike... but hey its commendable as far as I'm concerned.
I'll close on a more serious note with a legitimate political event.
DeLay conspiracy charge tossed out
Groan.......
Turns out it is a legitimate formality. Of course Delay is likely guilty of this charge, however the date he committed the offense was before it was made illegal in 2003.
Luckily we still must hold out hope that this scoundrel will get what is coming to him with the money laundering charges. Delay has been instrumental in my opinion, in the destruction of the republican platform. His rise to power has paralleled an increase in corruption amongst the ranks of the GOP, previously more of a democratic problem. Delay is an obstructionist, in the tradition of George Mitchell and Tom Daschle, accept he's a Republican. And the most absurd thing of all is his alliance with the Christian Right. Seems a bit hypocritical if you ask me.
Traditionally the rich and powerful tend to get out of such quandaries, however Delay may have wronged enough people (I hope) along the way that he doesn't get away this time.
People like this, regardless of their allegiances serve to damage the democratic process. Yes I agree that it may be dirty politics that is playing a large role in "making an example of Delay". However it is fitting, because it is dirty politics that let him rise to power.
Posted by George N. Parks at 11:28 PM 0 comments
Another Week Begins
Well I had a nice weekend, and I hope all of you did as well. Kate & I decorated a small Christmas tree for my apartment. Saturday night I did some Christmas shopping, and attended Brian Glassner & Family's annual Christmas extravaganza. There were likely 70 people there, and I got to talk with several colleagues from Peoples Genetics/Beckman Coulter.
My work week prior was a bit aggravating, and I can only hope that this one is smoother and greets me with a sunnier and smoother progression. I get tired of human nature from time to time, and last week was an example of that scenario.
I wouldn't want to be the engineer which miscalculated this one.
Blast can't topple state's tallest building
Anyway, lets see how Monday goes!
Posted by George N. Parks at 12:28 AM 0 comments
Thursday, December 01, 2005
#ucker Carlson, RENT, and Chips
Remember this, my fair friends, remember these proverbs... lines... sayings... what have you.
First: "Tongue in cheek"
Second: "Take it with a grain of salt"
Ok now first on tonight's plate, the ever wise Michael Caprio forwarded me the transcript to Tucker Carlson's last show where he interviewed Bruce Friedrich, some ninny from PETA, but before I get into that.. Let me say a few words about Tucker.
I hate him. This arrogant prick perpetually looks 25 even though he's in his late 30s by now. I hate him because he's constantly smiling with his eyes... and because he always seems jovial and good natured, even though you know the guy thinks he's God's gift to humanity. He is of course much smarter (in his mind) than all of his guests and callers. He is silver spoon fed and has lived in his life in a world of disillusionment likely surrounded by other elitists, journalists and Hollywood types. He generally agrees with the agenda of the right, (that's kind of his schtick) mainly just for the sake of agreement (Although I admit he was a dissenter after Katrina which impressed me... yet he depends on ratings, and that would have been really dim to support W and Browny on that front.)
I watched a show a few weeks back where he read a complaint by an Animal control officer not getting respected for the job they do. Tucker responds by saying they are "dog catchers" and the title "Animal control officer is a load of political correctness crap." He goes on to insult the intelligence of people who are ACOs, and says they must be too stupid to do any other job. Of course at the end of the episode an Animal control officer calls and asks for an apology, and Carlson with a smirk calls him stupid on air, and tells him his opinion isn't worth spit because he's nothing more than a worthless dog catcher.
OK... before ending my rant on what a jerk %ucker Carlson is, I hate to admit it, but I enjoy his commentary. Bottom line is Carlson is entertaining... and as much as I think the guy is a total ass... he can be funny, and he is sharp. And his curly locks, idiotic bow tie, and eternally smiling eyes (which make me feel violent at times) are a persona that evokes a certain charisma. It was a smart move, something that is rare in journalism, to develop a signature look. I do find myself quite interested in his shows, and occasionally they have some legitimacy as well.
Jon Stewart, who played somewhat of a role in Carlson getting fired from Crossfire, was on back during the Kerry/Bush race. You may find this transcript rather amusing.
Jon Stewart on Crossfire
Ok Caps, back to your PETA interview. Finally here is the link.
Taking on PETA over new ad campaign
From the people that brought you such gems as "Chicken farms are equivalent to the holocaust" comes PETA's new campaign, "Your Daddy Kills Animals".
I really think that PETA is a big practical joke. I think these guys go out and make these completely insane claims, and I think they are well aware of the absurdity. The whole premise of PETA is absurd, because really to fulfill their goals we should all just kill ourselves simultaneously and leave the world to the non-humans.
I really think these guys like Bruce, get back from "The Situation", they go home watch it and are rolling on the floor laughing, while they are eating beef jerky. I think they're laughing at all of the naive kids, college students, and old ladies they manage to brainwash. Really joining PETA is akin to "I hate people and I want to piss them off", or "I have a 76 IQ and I'm lucky I can breathe without instruction". Even if you are an extremist Animal Rights activist, I don't know how you could join an organization as morally reprehensible as PETA. Of course I feel similar sentiments about Greenpeace, however they look like civilized diplomatic geniuses next to PETA. These people are all just bored and desperately want attention. I have to give them some accolades for dreaming up some hysterical ways of offending people. If I could keep a straight face, I might join them just so I could be in on the joke. Just so I too could relish in the humor of all of the fools that actually take PETA seriously.
I must commend Carlson on his use of the word "axiomatic" and to Friedrich for using "hyperbole" in the same sentence while relating to "Saturday morning cartoons".
Ooohhh and here's Carlson in a priceless moment. CARLSON: "I've got four kids. Don't lecture me about kids. I know I would-if someone slipped this under my door, I'd punch them out. I couldn't handle it." Funny stuff! Am I right? :D Or, am I right? I wonder if he fights with his fists circling in front of him like a 1920s boxer, he'd probably wear a bow tie with is white T shirt, and I imagine he'd confront the distributor of the PETA propaganda by saying in a "Curly-like" voice "Oh? Wise Guy eehh?!"
On to my next topic.... RENT, yes I thought I'd take a few minutes to abuse this disparity of pop culture.
For those of you that saw Team America, wasn't the parody called "LEASE" fantastic?
Anyway... as many of you know, anything that is massively popular is usually going to be met by some criticism by me, because after all, most people have bad taste. Oh and before I forget, I'm better than most people too. :D I'll go into a bit more about the chip on my shoulder later, but for now, lets stick to bashing RENT.
Someone mentioned RENT to me a couple days ago, and I absently brushed it off as "It’s not my thing". What I should have said was "ITS REALLY REALLY not my thing". The problem is there are so many things that piss me off about the concept of RENT that I would have to devote some time to do so, and I would really have to gather my thoughts on the issue.
So tonight while I was eating two greasy artery clogging slices of pizza at the Hi-Fi in Cambridge, I was reading "dig" a free weekly alternative news magazine here in Boston. Low and behold there was a review of someone who saw RENT and it articulated what I also think about it, but was too tired to say. And not only that, it got the rage flowing in me, and really my creative juices too... making me realize to the fullest extent... Why RENT pisses me off. The following is the review.
RENT: A phony romp that makes you pay
Of course it starts off by dissing rock musicals... which to a great extent I'd agree with, but not totally. For example "Grease" is escapism, it isn't serious, it is fun. So no one takes grease really seriously because it is fantasy. Same thing for "The Rocky Horror Picture Show" its fun. So then you have some of your more serious rock band/ abstract Rock operas like "Tommy" by the Who, and "The Wall" by Pink Floyd. However they are abstract and bizarre, surreal. No one tries to claim they are realistic, but that they rather, explain life with absurd visuals and bizarre plots. Anyway, back to this great review... (or poor review depending on where your sovereignty lies)
David Wildman writes: "So it’s pretty obvious what’s going to happen when you take an alleged rock musical, featuring a cheery plot where most of the characters are dying of AIDS, and then attempt to make a film about it. Watch out, world.
Now, for some reason that I will never fathom, throngs of people seemed to actually like the Broadway production of Rent in the ‘90s, and advanced screenings of the film version have packed local theatres. Then again, masses of people liked Friends in the ‘90s, too."
Wow, preach to the choir David... I hate Friends too! Its too perfect, pretty people with crappy jobs living in expensive places... and they are all superficial with the exception of Ross, who is well.. superficial and pathetic to boot.
I'll tell you David, Dave, Dav-O, I'll tell you why. I'LL TELL YOU WHY, I'll tell you why people like it. Because to not like it would be insensitive to the plight of those who have AIDS. Because AIDS is something we should all care about and fight to help stop. If you aren't a hep-cat you probably won't like rent. You probably think only homosexuals get AIDS. Not only are you a bigot but you are stupid, and insensitive, did I mention that you are INSENSITIVE?! Yes DAVE... how could you, how could you be so thoughtless... I bet you would like to burn the rainforest down too, wouldn't you. WOULDN'T YOU!? And you know what.. if you hadn't been such a prick and if you had actually liked RENT... if you weren't into environmental destruction, not to mention starving the old people and the homeless.... YES YES, that’s right. People who don't like RENT, obviously want to kill the homeless. In fact I'm sure that people who hate RENT, I'm sure they think that all of the homeless should die of AIDS. It would serve them right for being stinky homeless losers. I bet you anything all people who hate RENT think that.
SO Dave, RENT can be an entire Broadway production, and now movie, of mediocre filler songs, which aren't memorable. Songs with lyrics that should have never been sung with enthusiasm. Ballads that would make me want to watch CATS instead with Barbara Streisand performing every part. But you Dave, you have to like it, because if you don't, well you are just a really bad person.
That is why people like it, because they think it makes them politically aware. It makes them hip and liberal and in touch with inner city bohemians, who mind you are nothing like the people in RENT.
I like this particular line from the review: "Seeing the drag queen (Wilson Germain Heredia) singing and prancing around Washington Square Park drives home the crux of the matter here: As a play, Rent is already a naive, idealized urban fantasy hiding behind the real-life problem of AIDS; setting it in an actual urban environment only serves to throw its phoniness into sharp relief."
Part of what irks me is you have these suburbanites who have spent their lives learning ballet, or kids with trust funds who never paid for their own car insurance acting like they KNOW, like they can relate to poverty. They have a superior idealistic world-view, and they care. Now if any one of these actors and actresses met the people they played they would probably be repulsed and would treat them like vermin. Perhaps I'm wrong. I hope I'm wrong.
To me the real battle on AIDS isn't the drug addicts and promiscuous people. Unfortunately most of these people will crash and burn with or without AIDS. They are people who are in serious need of help, and have given up on life. Most of them don't have incredible dreams... because hey.. let’s be real, most people generally don't have incredible dreams. And even less people who are addicts be it sexually or drug wise, are dreaming of the ten year plan. It’s more like how can I get the next fix, or recover from the last one. I feel pity for these people, but truthfully theirs is a different problem than a cure for AIDS.
The battle for AIDS in the United States is for victims of rape, naive teens, or others extraordinary circumstances like receiving tainted blood. People in today's world are well aware of the risks associated with dirty needles and sex. They just don't care, and so their plights really sadden me, but fighting it must be approached differently, and I don't necessarily see them as innocents, and I know that makes me an evil thoughtless person, but hey.. that is how it is. I'd much prefer advances in cancer or even heart disease because they strike in a more random manner, and more frequently.
Now people in Africa, can still claim ignorance and the situation there is a real tragedy and danger to the world. Those people need our help. They need to be shown the way to prevent this disaster.
Ok, last on the agenda tonight:
I have a chip on my shoulder. It is quite big, and weighty, and it is because I have better ideals, I'm smarter, and I'm prettier than nearly everyone (Except for maybe Tucker Carlson). I've decided that this Chip is such an asset that I'm going to begin manufacturing them. I'll call them "George's Original Plain Shoulder Chips". Now notice that I said they are plain. Now this is important because chips come in all different flavors. I personally believe that everyone should have a chip on their shoulder of their own making, their own tastes, yes indeed, their own flavor.
We all had different backgrounds, influences, life scarring events, traumas, obstacles, humiliating experiences, and insecurities. All of these are necessary to give your chip your own unique allure and specialty. Take your flaws and add flavor to "George's Original Plain Shoulder Chip" for the low one time only price of $19.95. And, yes, get this! If you call now I'll throw in your very own inflatable ego... because you can never be too proud. Remember "George's Original Plain Shoulder Chips" make wonderful holiday presents!
Posted by George N. Parks at 6:49 PM 0 comments
Ramble on....
I need a vacation, the thanksgiving break didn't cut it, and the Christmas and New Years breaks for me, amount to nothing more than two long weekends. And honestly, I love the holidays and everything, but often as I get older Christmas in itself seems like another work day. You have to put on a good face and sort of step into that persona that people expect out of you. I can't talk politics or religion (perhaps outside of music & film, these are two of my favorite topics) and I often end up lounging on the couch (whoopie!) without control of the remote control (arrrgh!) which is fine, because if someone gave me the control... I couldn't watch what I wanted to anyway. My tastes and indecisiveness would likely make everyone else miserable. And after all, I'm all about the pleasing of others, a Utilitarian at the core. Then when I'm not watching the antique road show, I'm helping with various chores so the house guests don't think my mother is a slob. (This usually consists of my Aunt, and... ummm did I mention my Aunt?) The menial tasks are actually fine. As a child of course I couldn't stand doing that stuff, but if I have to sit on the couch watching some dog contest on TLC, I might just slip into some sort of coma or spontaneously combust. So bring on the busy work!
Anyway I'll stop complaining now. If I don't I'll ramble on for ever and ever. It was either this, or complain about my day at work. I think it is healthier to complain about the holidays. I think my complaints about work would merely be a reflection of my own over tired nature, and for the most part are exaggerated due to this. Some might say it would be better to let it all out. One might argue if the tension builds eventually I'll be like Michael Douglass in Falling Down. Eh.. I'm liable to push someone who's pissing me off into an oncoming subway car before I get up on a building and start shooting, so if I do go crazy.. It will just be one random unfortunate soul who will bear the brunt of the inflicted suffering.
I did have a splendid night out with Kate tonight, which served as a bit of a healing element. We went to Mary Chung's for supper. They made beef with peppersteak and onion for me, even though it was not on their menu. In addition, we had Peking Dumplings (pan fried) and Kate got their hot and spicy sweet and sour chicken, specifying to make it mild. (Mary Chung's is pretty much spicy all around)
Well... Here's an article about a Gallup/CNN poll that says 6 in 10 Americans don't think we should pull out of Iraq until certain goals are achieved. That is good to hear, however I would be more comfortable if the number was 7 in 10. W's speech today appears to be more of the same old B.S. I really am irritated by the elaborate sets that this administration uses to promote an issue. I don't believe it is helping to drive home any of the messages of the president. If anything these graphics and occasionally banners have created more criticism than ease of use.
Poll: Most doubt plan for Iraq victory
Of course with a title like that, you'd never realize that this actually isn't a simple rally cry to remove troops.
Anyway, it is time to put my head on a pillow and dream of sugar plums (what ever the hell they are).
Posted by George N. Parks at 1:14 AM 0 comments